Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Keywords

Latest topics
» A Question
Today at 8:31 am by Roger Melly

» Disclosures, Comply or Not.....
Yesterday at 11:01 am by Beachcomber

» Consents, Questionnaires and Supply of Personal Data.
Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:45 pm by Beachcomber

» Notes For Those Facing Review For The First Time.
Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:51 am by Beachcomber

» Cheshire Chief Constable in Trouble.
Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:17 am by Mercury

» SMP Withdraws From Review Programme.
Tue Feb 06, 2018 8:59 am by H R Numpty

» Be Prepared!
Sun Feb 04, 2018 9:57 am by Twix

» Narpo Advice.
Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:52 pm by Beachcomber

» Pipin Website Changes.
Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:45 am by oswald

February 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Calendar Calendar


The Sidwell Case

Go down

The Sidwell Case

Post by Beachcomber on Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:53 am

avatar
Beachcomber
Admin

Posts : 185
Points : 461
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2015-01-22

http://www.pipin.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: The Sidwell Case

Post by P1 on Fri Feb 06, 2015 1:53 pm

Seems a bizarre judgement.

The question concerning disablement relates to permanent disablement from performing the ordinary duties of a police officer - not permanent disablement per se (if you see what I mean).

Given that the medical evidence stated that Mr Sidwell's condition would only improve if he left the police it seems quite straightforward to me - Mr Sidwell is permanently disabled from performing the ordinary duties of a police officer.

"Ordinary duties" includes pretty much all duties as I understand it.

P1

Posts : 6
Points : 6
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-04

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum